Over 58921

Weather Politics

EXTREME WEATHER RECORDS AND GLOBAL WARMING - Once again the data shows Anthropogenic Global Warming to be the Religion of the Stupid.


CLIMATE CHANGE - There will winners and losers.


TAGS: cold weather global warming funny
Rating: 3.46/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 11:49 pm
...bwhahhhahahhhAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA. *sigh* *wipe away* Remember when your mother said "Son, they are not laughing AT you, they are laughing WITH you?" God Bless her soul....that's sweet she would lie to her kid like that. X-D
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 11:47 pm
I really hit a b-utton with that, huh? Glad to hear it, Arnnatz. :-) So without further ado: What is "so I knew you that you" supposed to mean? When the mental-disabled take the stage during amateur hour, do we laugh out of politeness? I can do that...
OTC - January 24, 2014, 11:40 pm
Well Sophia, your recent run of poor grammar is a dead giveaway you are off your meds, so I knew you that you would understand that until you get medicated
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 6:27 pm
What does "you to take your meds again" mean? lol..WORD OF ADVICE: Grammar isn't THAT important when having a simple chat with someone online. But IT IS if you are TRYING TO BE 'witty'...or impossible because "you NEED to take your meds again",Arnnatz.X-D
OTC - January 24, 2014, 5:48 pm
you to take your meds again, you're losing focus as to who is talking to you need
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 3:50 pm
Wow, you sure showed me, Arnnatz. I'm deeply offended here. Another tissue?
OTC - January 24, 2014, 3:28 pm
Nah. You'll need that tissue when you sneak your dad's Playboy in your room
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 3:22 pm
Still b-utthurt? Tissue? X-D
OTC - January 24, 2014, 3:15 pm
If your car overheats, its strickly your fault not some part failing, just as the earth overheating is man's fault. And what does "That's doesn't change..." suppose to mean? Bad grammar?
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 2:43 pm
That's nice,Curly :-) A little makebelieve never hurt anyone.Maybe when you're little older you can sit at the big boys table & join adult conservations about big matters like science.For now,I get you have fun pretending to know what you're talking about
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 2:37 pm
Really now...Curly? And remind me again how many of the world's respected scientists 'conclusively' believe manmade GW is real? Here's a little hint: it's higher than the 95% number you just provided. ;-)
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 2:35 pm
Cognitive dissonance again,Curly. You can't present someone's opinion as fact.You do know what an OP/ED is, right?Everyone from Karl Rove to Al Gore to Howard Stern has done an OP/ED.So is Stern, right? The problem is not enough h** les***** in the world?
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 2:34 pm
I think you've watched too much Captin Planet, GW deniers arn't out to destroy the planet we just don't like being told what to do, 95% of people belivied the Nazi's when they blamed the jews for Germany's ruin.
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 2:28 pm
Ok well Nazis or sup***illin GW deniers are just people on a computer, some of them used to work for NASA according to OTC's article, but you get s**t canned for thinking that it's not humans causing the warming.
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 2:20 pm
The OP/ED of the article is that GW is real watch out, the only science presented is that GW is in a lul and they don't know why.
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 2:03 pm
P.S. That's not a Nazi thing. It's a quote from the movie "The Dark Knight" about the Joker... and idiots like him who get off ruining civilization whilst under pretentious nonsense and ideology driving them.
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 2:02 pm
I actually read the article.You're engaging in cognitive dissonance. Everything in that articles says,"GW is real and watch out" not "there's reason to believe it's a big fraud". You're seeing what you want to,and at the expense of reality.Your karma,mate
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:59 pm
That's the problem...it doesn't matter what YOU think.lol.. I think it's BS that my car sometimes overheats. That's doesn't change the fact something is wrong with it and that I will need a certain part to fix it...lol
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 1:47 pm
Again with the Nazi thing. We don't want the world to burn or get polluted, but we also don't want to be told how to live by some one in a different part of the world who needs to live by different enviromental regulations.
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 1:44 pm
The more and more I look at Individual trees the more they look like B/S. They can't explain the lul in GW so they grasp at straws and say it's at the bottom of the sea rather than just saying the sun has entered a new cycle.
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:24 pm
Curly...the choice facing you is this. Accept the facts and do your part to save our species from destruction. Or you can choose to support a sadistic psychopathic worldview where, to use a famous quote, "some men just want to watch the world burn."
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:20 pm
If you had actually read the NEW source you just posted, it is totally supporting the 97% consensus. In fact, it says not to be too c-ocky about this 'cooling' period b/c it's likely the heat might shoot through the roof after this bipolar weather.
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:17 pm
Let's not enable sociopaths like OTC who have a sadistic death wish and want to punish the human race because they hate themselves and want the rest of us to go down with the ship with them but are too cowardly to admit it...mmmm, k?
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:15 pm
Ever hear that saying that, you a missing the forest because you are too busy looking at the trees? lol
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:05 pm
*sigh* Curly....lol...there's only ONE true science. Those studies I keep bragging about are conclusive and look at the big picture. They took into account those objections and have vetted their findings many times over. Same results. GW suxx and is here
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 11:18 am
"The earth is warming but only at the bottom of the deepest sea, inside a volcano and at your mother in laws house, you know all those places you avoid."
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 11:17 am
Then they grasp at straws and say that the heat is hidden in the deep ocean, that place humans have very little oppertuntiy to research or draw comparisons about.
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 11:14 am
So the only true science presented in this one showes that there has not been any significant warming since 98, http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/global-warming-hiatus-tied-pacific-ocean-cooldown-20130829
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 10:07 am
OP/ED?... lol... You should take the time, Curly, to actually READ the source you posted. The OP in OP/ED stands for opinion. There is a reason that it isn't listed "as fact" the same way,as say,those scientific studies you don't like,which are conclusive
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 10:01 am
Wow, you just called me bigfoot. I'm insulted here. Still licking your wounds, eh? X-D
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 10:01 am
Struck a nerve a did I? X-D
OTC - January 24, 2014, 9:38 am
So just how far south are you moving faux?
OTC - January 24, 2014, 9:36 am
No idiot, link wasn't provided as proof, just humorous that if humans aren't to blame in the GW equation no one wanted to touch it. Goes to show how one sided the 'scientific' consensus is, sorry that went over your head, I'll try to dumb it down for ya
Curlyrocks - January 24, 2014, 9:34 am
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:28 am
You forgot this one. This reputable blogger says man-made GW is bogus because Bigfoot is moving South and he wouldn't do that if the weather was getting warm http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=is-global-warming-forcing-bigfoot-t-2008-11-1
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 1:24 am
Wow, you showed me. A blog from a non-journalist blogger. bwhahahahahAHAHAHA.. Really? That's your proof?? LMAO.. Not to mention another dead giveaway you're ARNTNUTHINBUTNUTZ: believing that tabloids and blogs pass as a legit sources. Try again. X-D
OTC - January 24, 2014, 12:42 am
Curly, he is correct, climate scientists aren't politically motivated, they are money motivated. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/10/nebraska-climate-scientists-heads-stuck-in-the-topsoil/
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:44 pm
It's a simple choice really: When it comes to "science" and the world of fact, what world do YOU want to live in? One where hysteria and ego does the thinking for you? Or one where independent thinking and the acceptance/facing of facts leads the way?
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:41 pm
But if you choose to live in an intellectual dark age, there ARE consequences. Ever hear the saying, there are no atheists in foxholes? Well...what use will anti-GW politics do for you when someday you and your family are dying from the consequences?
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:40 pm
The irony is that it's "politics" that are making you think otherwise, the very thing you are accusing the 'other side' of doing. But you are free to not believe in science. Just like you are free to believe in a flat Earth and Santa Jesus...
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:39 pm
But the truth is, that while that makes for great fiction, it's a terrible interpretation of reality. The fact is that 95%-97% of respected scientists and their studies are conclusive in their studies that GW is real, a threat and upon us...
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:37 pm
You never met the President and if all you know about the world is your limited interaction with it and what the tv tells you, then sure it is POSSIBLE you are stuck in "The Matrix" controlled by a liberal supercomputer brainwashing the masses...
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:36 pm
Have actually ever met President Obama in person?Probably not. So I told you the truth is that Mitt Romney actually won but the liberal media is lying to you,pumping false images through the tv and your news journals to trick you,that would be insane,yes?
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:35 pm
Some people like Vik really are just plain dumb, or mentally ill. But you strike me as a middle of the road guy. So why let politicians do all the thinking for you? It is a fact that science has conclusively proven the link b/t man and GW. So now what?
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:34 pm
At least you a real person, not a sociopath like OTC who actually knows better, but simply doesn't care, then lies to cover his inability to express empathy. But what gets me is when people WITH a conscience, like you, get caught up in that mob thinking..
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 11:32 pm
But who is the THEY you keep speaking of. When you confuse delusion and ego for fact, that's when dark times like war or the Holocaust arise. There is a world of fact. You do realize this, yes? You can't have your own set of facts...
Curlyrocks - January 23, 2014, 11:06 pm
but the only Americans who care about the Great Lakes live on them and the rest are screaming global warming because they live in a city with declining air quality and have been told it's a global problem.
Curlyrocks - January 23, 2014, 11:05 pm
It became a political issue when they decided to set policy and laws that hurts industry and blue collar jobs in the name of saving the planet. I get that we need to keep the planet clean, America could start by hold up its end of the great lakes act...
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 9:52 pm
Who is this "WE" conspiracy boy? Some people are looking at the science, without politics, and are simply concerned. My question to you is WHY does this have to be a political issues? The scientists involved were not politically motivated. Why r u?
Curlyrocks - January 23, 2014, 9:46 pm
We're not the ones who want to reduce the human population. We're not the ones pushing industry from slave labor in China because of a not in my back yard policy. Hard as this may be to hear but we're the laid back cool guys in this one you guys are squar
fauxnews - January 23, 2014, 5:51 pm
lol...Didn't notice that until now. That said, I don't disagree..GW deniers are about as bad as Holocaust deniers. You have no leg to stand on scientifically. So basically you're saying you don't care about the humanity of those hurt by pollution.
Curlyrocks - January 23, 2014, 5:45 pm
What's with you lately and trying to equate GW supporters to Nazis? We're not the ones trying to run the world and tell people what they can or can't do and have.

" OATHS ARE BUT WORDS, AND WORDS BUT WIND. " ~SAMUEL BUTLER - " I love the feeling of the fresh air on my face and the wind blowing through my hair." Evel Knievel

Climate Alarmism -

Global Warming Is A SCAM -

Remember when... -

if liberals believe 'warming' causes extreme winters -

TAGS: liberal lunacy weather excuses
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - March 28, 2015, 4:15 pm
Anecdotal? There is scientific evidence of orbital and solar cycles, volcanoe activity, el Nino, etc that clearly effect changes in climate. The Medieval Warming period had nothing to do with industrial man, but the climate warmed none the less
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:08 pm
for your proof,lame anecdotal evidence. a name change,snow. for their proof,a consensus of vetted studies.Wonder who we should trust? those dang atheist scientists with their degrees or an anonymous denier on a forum and his anecdotal evidence? funny that
OTC - March 28, 2015, 4:01 pm
But if it's truly "global" warming then there wouldn't be any cold regions to cause... oh wait, they changed the name, my bad
calron - March 28, 2015, 2:58 pm
In addition disruptions in weather patterns caused by changing air temperatures can cause areas to get colder than normal, even if overall global temps increase.
calron - March 28, 2015, 2:40 pm
It not actually as dumb as it sounds. For instance the increased water vapor that can be held by the air in warmer weather can cause more snow as it moves into a area that is cold enough. Thus more extreme snow storms can come about.

Climate Changes -

TAGS: climate weather environment government drought
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

MMessEnnBeeCee - June 4, 2015, 8:00 pm
That doesn't look like CO2, it looks like the bottom of a california lake where the water is being diverted from farming and human consumption so that the delta smelt can have plenty.

Climate Change -

TAGS: climate change environmentalism pollution weather
Rating: 1.89/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - December 11, 2014, 10:16 pm
Well, Oxygen is a by-product of just about all plant respiration, phytoplankton is one part of that equation. Keep in mind, over two-thirds of the Earth are covered by ocean.
crankyhead - December 11, 2014, 4:15 pm
There's a guy in the states who designed a solar powered boat to do just that very thing. If I had a million bucks to invest in his project, I would. There's a gold mine, just floating out there, waiting for someone to go get it.
Curlyrocks - December 11, 2014, 3:41 pm
more up from the bottom.
Curlyrocks - December 11, 2014, 3:41 pm
1/3rd from that 1/3rd from the rain forest and 1/3rd from the tiger belt in Russia was where I understood O2 to come from. And in my opinion it's in their best interests to learn how to collect plastic waste from the top of the sea rather than drilling ..
Cannabal - December 11, 2014, 3:02 pm
Actually, what all the plastic and petroleum pollution is doing to the ocean is killing phytoplankton, the most important organism on the planet, because THAT is what is producing the majority of Oxygen in the air.
Curlyrocks - December 10, 2014, 4:03 pm
I suppose that all the plastic in the sea is taking up room that algae should be using to trap carbon, but other than that it's pretty round about. Unless I get my way and we start fishing all that plastic out of the sea and burning it for energy.
Cannabal - December 10, 2014, 2:55 pm
Pollution does have a large effect on the environment, which has a gradual effect on weather patterns. Take acid rain, for instance.
Curlyrocks - December 10, 2014, 2:37 pm
I don't remember plastic refuse being part of the climate change debate. Part of the larger debate on pollution yes, but not climate change.

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: climate change deniers jon stewart weather
Rating: 1.27/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

DebtToAmerica - April 26, 2015, 12:10 am
it draws focus away from the fact that the light absorbtion spectrums of atmospheric gases are well known, as are the wavelengths at which blackbody radiation (heat which can be picked up by thermal cameras) radiates heat back into space.
DebtToAmerica - April 26, 2015, 12:02 am
i dont think we should put much faith in climate models, their complexity makes them unreliable for quantitative predictions, and creates a false impression that the model is neccesary to support the hypothesis of anthropogenic climate change.
Bandit5906 - April 25, 2015, 8:15 pm
Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures The Global Warming Policy Foundation has enlisted an international team of five distinguished scientists to carry out a full inquiry = fraud
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:20 pm
And Limbaugh and his devoted listeners are a bunch lying idiots - is all I was saying hun. The only alternative was to never entertain his politically motivated smear against science in the first place. I concur with the rest sweetie.
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:16 pm
No the alternative is not to trust anyone else. I've already concluded that the info likely does not invalidate the ICP report based on what I've found.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:12 pm
And the authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all.Authors noted that"the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:11 pm
Well - the alternative is to trust Limbaugh then, who is a f***ing lying idiot. Stop playing dumb. Only an idiot would disagree with that. Unless you want to outright expose your right-wing bias, let's say this safely cancels out Limbaugh's take on this.
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:09 pm
“Our model shows these wiggles can be big enough that they could have accounted for a reasonable portion of the accelerated warming we experienced from 1975 to 2000, as well as the reduced rate in warming that occurred from 2002 to 2013.”
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:07 pm
While I'm here, here's a lay article on the study: https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/global-warming-more-moderate-worst-case-models
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:07 pm
I've said several times that natural variability could explain the pause without invalidating AGW. :) And I'm lothed to trust MMA do to there biases, so I would prefer another source.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:01 pm
Limbaugh and the other deniers are using this to conflate a phony debate that doesnt exist.Science isnt pretending to be infallible or above skepticism.But after their extensive research hun it's reasonable to infer MMCC is unequivocal based on their work
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:59 pm
And the authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all.Authors noted that"the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:58 pm
One of the Duke study's authors, Duke doctoral candidate Patrick Brown has been very vocal in his denouncement over Limbaugh's remarks and lies. Brown emailed Media matters himself. I doubt they are making it up. They are just carrying the story.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:57 pm
P.S. It does say that the middle ground models should still be accurate.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:55 pm
As it is, the study basically says natural variability throws the models off, http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150421/srep09957/full/srep09957.html
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:52 pm
I'm having trouble finding a source for that quote other than Media Matters for America, do you have a link?
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:50 pm
So, yeah, great source you chose there deniers. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:50 pm
The authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all." They also said it's "wrong" to attribute recent warming to solar activity,and added that human activity is a much bigger contributor.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:47 pm
Yeah, Rush Limbaugh jumped on this. Taking it out of context ENTIRELY. And one of the actual Duke authors noted that "the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
Bandit5906 - April 24, 2015, 10:47 pm
Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are down to ‘natural variability’, says study Duke University